Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com
Image from Google Jackets

The paradox of predictivism / Eric Christian Barnes.

By: Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press; 2011.Description: x, 265 p. ; 25 cmISBN:
  • 9781107405165
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 501 BAR
Contents:
CHAPTER 1 The paradox of predictivism; CHAPTER 2 Epistemic pluralism; CHAPTER 3 Predictivism and the Periodic Table of the Elements; CHAPTER 4 Miracle arguments and the demise of strong predictivism; CHAPTER 5 The predicting community; CHAPTER 6 Back to epistemic pluralism; CHAPTER 7 Postlude on old evidence; CHAPTER 8 A paradox resolved.
Summary: In The Paradox of Predictivism, Eric Barnes contends that the successful prediction of evidence serves as a testament to the overall credibility of the predictor, unlike evidence that is used to support a theory. He illustrates his argument with a significant example from nineteenth-century chemistry: Mendeleev's Periodic Law and its successful predictions of the existence of various elements.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Shelving location Call number Status Barcode
Reference Reference Kalaignar Centenary Library Madurai ENGLISH-REFERENCE BOOKS மூன்றாம் தளம் / Third floor 501 BAR (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 311803

Includes bibliographical references and index.

CHAPTER 1 The paradox of predictivism; CHAPTER 2 Epistemic pluralism; CHAPTER 3 Predictivism and the Periodic Table of the Elements; CHAPTER 4 Miracle arguments and the demise of strong predictivism; CHAPTER 5 The predicting community; CHAPTER 6 Back to epistemic pluralism; CHAPTER 7 Postlude on old evidence; CHAPTER 8 A paradox resolved.

In The Paradox of Predictivism, Eric Barnes contends that the successful prediction of evidence serves as a testament to the overall credibility of the predictor, unlike evidence that is used to support a theory. He illustrates his argument with a significant example from nineteenth-century chemistry: Mendeleev's Periodic Law and its successful predictions of the existence of various elements.

Find us on the map